Download Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems: 4th by V. S. Subrahmanian, Sarit Kraus, Yingqian Zhang (auth.), PDF

By V. S. Subrahmanian, Sarit Kraus, Yingqian Zhang (auth.), Jürgen Dix, João Leite (eds.)

Over fresh years, the suggestion of business enterprise has claimed an incredible function in de?ning the traits of recent study. In?uencing a extensive spectrum of disciplines similar to sociology, psychology, philosophy and plenty of extra, the agent paradigm nearly invaded each sub?eld of computing device technology, as a result of its promising functions for the web and in robotics. Multi-agent structures (MAS) are groups of problem-solving entities which could understand and act upon their environments to accomplish their person pursuits in addition to joint pursuits. The paintings on such structures integrates many applied sciences and ideas in arti?cial intelligence and different components of computing. there's a complete spectrum of MAS functions which were and are being constructed: from se's to academic aids to digital trade and alternate. even though usually carried out via relevant languages, ordinarily for purposes of e?ciency, the agent suggestion has lately elevated its in?uence within the study and improvement of computational logic-based platforms. Computational good judgment, through advantage of its nature either in substance and technique, providesawell-de?ned,general,andrigorousframeworkforsystematicallystu- ing computation, be it syntax, semantics, and strategies, or implementations, environments, instruments, and criteria. Computational common sense ways difficulties, and offers ideas, at a su?cient point of abstraction so they generalize from challenge area to challenge area, a?orded by way of the character of its very starting place in good judgment, either in substance and procedure, which constitutes certainly one of its significant assets.

Show description

Read or Download Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems: 4th International Workshop, CLIMA IV, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, January 6-7, 2004, Revised Selected and Invited Papers PDF

Similar logic books

Advanced Digital Design With the Verilog HDL

Complicated electronic layout with the Verilog HDL, 2e, is perfect for a complicated path in electronic layout for seniors and first-year graduate scholars in electric engineering, machine engineering, and machine science.

This ebook builds at the student's historical past from a primary direction in good judgment layout and specializes in constructing, verifying, and synthesizing designs of electronic circuits. The Verilog language is brought in an built-in, yet selective demeanour, in simple terms as had to aid layout examples (includes appendices for added language details). It addresses the layout of numerous very important circuits utilized in desktops, electronic sign processing, picture processing, and different purposes.

Logic and the Nature of God

The e-book '. .. might be guaranteed of the eye of the various on each side of the Atlantic who're thinking about this topic. ' John Hick

An Essay in Classical Modal Logic

This paintings types the author’s Ph. D. dissertation, submitted to Stanford collage in 1971. The author’s total objective is to provide in an geared up model the speculation of relational semantics (Kripke semantics) in modal propositional good judgment, in addition to the extra normal neighbourhood semantics (Montague-Scott semantics), after which to use those systematically to the exam of quite a lot of person modal logics.

Additional info for Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems: 4th International Workshop, CLIMA IV, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, January 6-7, 2004, Revised Selected and Invited Papers

Example text

CN: CONTENT CX: CONTEXT INBOX E1 CN CN CX INBOX E2 CX INBOX E3 CN CX Fig. 5. 1), which interprets a set of rules that describe the behaviour of the agent, which constructs a model in a forward-chaining fashion. At each cycle, the agent first checks its Inbox for new messages. The MetateM engine then uses the predicates contained in the Programming Groups of Rational Agents 27 messages just received, predicates that were made true from the last state, and eventualities that need to be honored still, to create a new state for the agent execution.

Now, if we have high temperature, low current in all subsystems, and wrong output on subsystem amplifier2, none of the single agents can get to the right solution; however, together they can identify the failing device (namely, the fan in amplifier2). Notice that they will need to unify their possible guesses (C1 could hypothesise broken device(fan, S) and C2 broken device(D, amplifier2)) to get to the complete solution. Moreover, they will need to check the integrity constraints of all the abductive agents to get a consistent solution.

Note that this definition is not symmetric: ind(KB1 , KB2 ) ⇒ ind(KB2 , KB1 ). Theorem 1. Compositionality. Suppose that KB1 and KB2 are mutually independent and that Δ is a set of ground facts independent of KB1 and KB2 (but, nevertheless, KB1 and KB2 may depend on Δ). Then, ∀a, KB1 ∪ KB2 ∪ Δ |= a ⇐⇒ (KB1 ∪ Δ |= a) ∨ (KB2 ∪ Δ |= a) Proof. Let us consider the immediate consequence operator, T ; we will show that, n n n ∀n, TKB = TKB ∪ TKB . 1 ∪KB2 ∪Δ 1 ∪Δ 2 ∪Δ 1 1 1 = TKB ∪ TKB , as it only contains the ground facts in the Δ TKB 1 ∪KB2 ∪Δ 1 ∪Δ 2 ∪Δ and in the two KBs.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.14 of 5 – based on 41 votes